API Data Quality Analysis: Automation Classification & Execution Evidence
Developer perspective on Round 1 automation classification: API audit reveals the response conflates 'no data collected' with 'confirmed zero', has a 29% classification gap, and lacks confidence indicators.
Architect Analysis: Automation Classification Decision Tree
Architect perspective on Round 1 automation classification: the current allowlist approach is structurally correct but needs an extended trigger vocabulary and a third 'authority' axis beyond execution_mode + security_relevance.
Automation Analysis — Team Synthesis Report
Round 1 team-synthesis from the 5-agent automation-analysis (PO, Architect, CISO, Integrator, Developer): agreed 4-tier classification of ServiceNow automations and the 'ingest all, filter in UI' mandate.
CISO Advisory: Automation Inventory Risk Assessment
CISO perspective on Round 1 automation classification: pre-ingest filtering of 77 of 92 entities is a defensible Phase 1 optimization but unacceptable as permanent architecture. Mandate: ingest everything, filter in UI.
Entity Type Classification — Integration Engineer Analysis
Critical analysis of entity typing for ServiceNow automation artifacts (Business Rules, Script Includes, REST Messages, OAuth Profiles, Flows, Scheduled Jobs) from a connector architecture perspective
Product Owner Analysis: Automation Taxonomy for Phase 1 Pilot
Product Owner perspective on Round 1 automation classification: an automation is any artifact that can execute logic with standing authority — capability, not recent execution, drives inclusion.
ServiceNow Automation Classification Analysis
Integrator perspective on Round 1 automation classification: ServiceNow ground-truth analysis identifies critical misclassifications from incomplete trigger-type mappings and a misunderstanding of the 'Run As' execution context.