Differentiation
SecurityV0 is not a replacement for IAM, DSPM, or CNAPP. Those systems remain necessary.
The practical gap is evidence and governance for what live AI workflows actually do across systems.
SecurityV0 helps answer the operational questions that follow: should this live workflow keep running as it is, what authority did it actually use, what changed, and what needs to change first? It does that with evidence about what the workflow actually did, under whose authority it acted, what it reached across systems, and how teams can explain and defend it later.
Why Customers Need This Even If They Already Have The Stack
IAM shows assigned access. DSPM shows where sensitive data lives. CNAPP shows cloud posture and cloud-local paths. SecurityV0 shows what the workflow actually executed across systems, under whose authority, with what delegated access, and what needs to change during review, after drift, or after an incident.
Vs DSPM And Data Tools
DSPM and data-security tools are strong at showing where sensitive data lives, how it is labeled, and where broad exposure may exist.
They usually do not show which AI workflow actually touched that data, under whose authority it acted, what delegated access was involved, or whether the same workflow is now running with broader cross-system reach than intended.
If you already have DSPM, SecurityV0 answers the operational question DSPM leaves open: which workflows reached sensitive data, how they got there, whether they should keep running that way, and which ones need to be narrowed or stopped.
Vs IAM And IGA
IAM and IGA tools are the system of record for identities, entitlements, approvals, and access reviews. They are still required.
The gap is that app-by-app review and assigned permissions no longer describe real behavior once a workflow can act on behalf of a user, use multiple tokens, and chain systems at runtime.
SecurityV0 shows what the workflow actually did, with granted access as supporting context. It answers the questions IAM cannot answer cleanly on its own: what actually ran, under whose authority, with what delegated access, what it reached across systems, and whether the workflow still matches what was approved.
If you already have IAM or IGA, SecurityV0 is what turns static review into a usable production governance, audit, and remediation decision for AI workflows.
Vs CNAPP
CNAPP tools are strong at cloud posture, misconfiguration detection, and reachable-path analysis inside cloud environments.
They usually do not reconstruct a workflow that starts in one system, runs through an identity layer, calls SaaS tools and cloud services, and then reaches data or egress outside the original cloud boundary.
SecurityV0 gives the cross-system workflow view CNAPP usually lacks. It shows what the workflow executed, what access still remains, where it crossed system boundaries, and what to change first. It also gives teams an audit-ready record of what happened later.
If you already have CNAPP, SecurityV0 tells you which live workflows create real cross-system risk, not just which cloud resources are exposed.
Category Line
SecurityV0 gives security teams audit-ready evidence and governance for AI workflows in production.