W1 UX Specification
Implementation status: Spec complete. 5 mockups produced and analyzed. 15 new UI components identified. Implementation planned — see W1 unified implementation plan.
Agentic AI Exposure Discovery & Assessment
Defines user-visible behavior for W1.
Scope: deterministic exposure discovery based on periodic refresh. No remediation workflow. No drift detection. No scoring model. No trend charts. No real-time monitoring.
W1 surfaces standing autonomous execution authority, activity magnitude, sensitive reach, external boundaries, and ownership state.
Terminology and Relationships
In W1, the primary unit of analysis and action is the Authority Path: a durable, evidence-backed execution chain showing how an automation/agent runs under standing credentials and what it can reach.
A Finding is a rule-based governance failure on an Authority Path — e.g., invalid ownership, sensitive data reach, LLM/external egress, or dormant standing authority. Findings are tracked with simple timing (first seen / last seen / active) derived from periodic refresh snapshots.
Exposure is the combined posture of an Authority Path as expressed by its currently active findings (i.e., “this path’s exposure right now”). Exposure is not a separate navigational object; it is what the product is discovering and presenting.
Risk Clusters are CISO-first prioritization groupings that collect Authority Paths whose currently active exposures match a compound governance condition (e.g., Sensitive + LLM + Active + Invalid Owner), so users triage by cluster and remediate at the path level.
1. Homepage
Purpose
Provide a 5-second control view answering:
- Which autonomous authority paths exist (standing execution authority)
- Whether they are actively executing
- Whether they reach sensitive data
- Whether they cross external or LLM boundaries
- Whether ownership is valid
This page must feel like authority governance, not inventory.
A. Posture Summary
Autonomous Execution Visibility
Displays:
-
Active Autonomous Authority Paths
-
Dormant Autonomous Authority Paths
- Smaller text label: "No execution in Last 30d"
Since Last Refresh
A single delta line:
Since Last Refresh:
- +X new autonomous authority paths
- +Y new ownership invalidations
No charts. No time series. Just discrete delta indicators.
B. Top 5 Risk Clusters
Homepage displays:
Top 5 Risk Clusters
Clusters are prioritized by compound governance condition, not single signals.
Example priority order:
- Sensitive + LLM + Active + Invalid Owner
- Sensitive + External + Active
- Sensitive + External + Dormant Authority
- External + Active
- Internal + Active + Invalid Owner
Each cluster card displays:
- Cluster title (compound condition)
- Number of authority paths
- Total executions (30d, aggregated across paths)
- Sensitive domains involved
- Counter displaying the change in the count of paths in the last 30 days
This shifts the narrative from exposure inventory to authority control.
2. Authority Paths (Filtered)
Grouped by selected Risk Cluster or opened directly from the Authority Paths navigation entry.
Each row represents one Authority Path. Findings are displayed as attributes on the path.
Collectively, these findings represent the path’s current Exposure.
Page title format: "Risk Clusters:
Example: Auto-GPT Instance #42 → OpenAI
Each Authority Path has a stable identifier: PATH-### (or canonical path_id) and its name in the "
A. Authority Path Row (Collapsed State)
Each row displays exactly:
- Path ID
- Path Name (Automation → Destination)
- Autonomous Execution indicator: must display "Autonomous Execution"
- Last Execution
- Executions (30d)
- Ownership Status
- Data Domains
- Egress Category
- Findings (pill group)
Findings (pill group) uses the same taxonomy as clusters, e.g.:
- Invalid Owner (Active; since
) - Sensitive Reach (Active; since
) - LLM Egress (Active; since
) - External Egress (Active; since
) - Dormant Standing Authority (Active; since
)
Nothing else structural.
No hop count. No trust depth. No credential posture.
B. Inline Expand
Expanding a row reveals the full Authority Context Panel.
The expanded layout contains three horizontal zones:
- Authority Path Diagram (top)
- Standing Authority + Ownership + Evidence (middle)
- Verification line + Detail link (bottom)
Findings Summary (Expanded)
Shows the same findings as the row pills, with timing:
For each finding:
- Status: Active / Resolved
- First Seen:
- Last Seen:
This is the minimum required to make exposure operationally credible over time.
Ownership Breakdown
Displays explicitly:
- Primary Owner: active / departed / disabled / none
- Secondary Owner: active / none
- Inherited Owner: present / none
Ownership status in the collapsed row is derived from this breakdown.
Evidence Completeness Strip
Compact visual indicator for:
- Current Roles
- Role History
- Execution Evidence
- Ownership Records
Each marked:
available / partial / unavailable
Hover shows explanation.
Verification Line
Displayed at the bottom of the expanded Path panel.
Shows:
- Evidence verified:
- Cross-system identity linkage verified
This confirms that authority mapping and evidence correlation succeeded.
3. Authority Path Detail View
Authority Path Detail Navigation
The Authority Path Detail screen is accessed from: View Full Detail → inside an expanded Authority Path row.
This screen is not a primary navigation item. It is a drill-down investigation surface.
Breadcrumb examples:
- Risk Clusters >
> PATH-021 - Authority Paths > PATH-021
Users must be able to return directly to the prior list.
Purpose
Provide full deterministic authority explanation for the path and its findings (i.e., the path’s exposure drivers).
A. Authority Path Diagram
Displayed as a linear execution lineage: Automation → Identity → Destination → Data Domain
Workload → Identity → Destination → Data Domain
No hop count displayed. No numeric trust-chain metrics.
B. Standing Authority Section
Fields:
- Execution Model
- Authentication Type
- Human Session Required
Example:
- Execution Model: Autonomous
- Auth Type: Client Credentials
- Human Session Required: No
C. Findings Panel
For each finding:
- Finding type (Invalid Owner, Sensitive Reach, LLM Egress, External Egress, Dormant, etc.)
- Status: Active / Resolved
- First Seen / Last Seen
- Evidence pointers used to assert it (references into Structured Evidence Panel)
D. Structured Evidence Panel
Sections:
1. Automation Metadata
- Source system
- Artifact identifier
- Last refreshed
2. Identity Binding
- RUNS_AS relationship
- Authentication protocol
- Target system
3. Execution Evidence
- Last Execution timestamp
- Executions (30d)
- Last action
- Target resource
- Outcome
- Last Used Authentication timestamp
No execution trend analysis. No charts.
4. Egress Configuration
- Destination boundary
- Target endpoint (if external)
- Egress category
E. Linkage Proof Card
Displays deterministic cross-system matching proof:
- Issuing Tenant
- Target Instance
- Matching Field
- Matching Value
Confirms cross-plane authority mapping.
F. Sensitive Domain Summary
Displays:
Sensitive Domains Reached:
- HR (confidential)
- Finance (restricted)
- Customer
Or:
Confidential / Restricted Resources Reachable: [count]
G. Remediation Placeholder
Disabled button:
Create Ticket (Future Capability)
No remediation workflow in W1.
4. Primary Investigation Flow
- Start on Homepage.
- Review Top 5 Risk Clusters.
- Click a cluster.
- Review execution magnitude, ownership status, and active findings in the path row.
- Expand row for authority context + findings timing summary.
- Open detail to inspect standing authority, findings timing, and linkage proof.
No alternate navigation. No graph browsing mode.
5. Interaction Rules
- Click Risk Cluster → Authority Paths (Filtered)
- Click row → expand inline
- Click View Detail → Authority Path Detail
- Click node in diagram → metadata side panel
One expanded path at a time.
6. Refresh Behavior
All data reflects periodic refresh only.
UI displays:
Last Refreshed: [timestamp]
Since Last Refresh delta line shown on Homepage.
Finding timing (first seen / last seen / active) is derived from refresh snapshots.
No streaming. No alerting. No continuous monitoring.
Communication Scope
W1 communicates:
- Active non-human execution authority (standing authority paths)
- Execution magnitude (30d count)
- Sensitive data reach
- External / LLM boundary crossing
- Ownership decay (invalid ownership)
It answers:
- Which autonomous paths exist
- How active they are
- What they can reach
- Whether anyone is accountable
Nothing beyond that scope.