Access Chain — Identity-Anchored Control Primitive
Access chain as the canonical product unit — identity-anchored, with paths as expandable evidence. Reframed per founder feedback from aggregation model to first-class control primitive.
Access chain as the canonical product unit — identity-anchored, with paths as expandable evidence. Reframed per founder feedback from aggregation model to first-class control primitive.
Round 2 CEO acceptance review of SecurityV0 platform. Visual review of 34 screenshots from 2026-03-19-demo-w1 snapshot. Evaluates against Sergey's 3-lens framework: partner sellability, junior analyst usability, safety/honesty.
Consolidated action plan — single source of truth for what to build next. Incorporates Sergey's 28 feedback items, Mar 20 locked founder decisions, cross-review corrections, code audit findings (Mar 21), and AutoResearchClaw research.
Answers to the cross-review request questions, re-evaluated from the original AI agent personas (QA, SecOps, Enterprise Executive).
Proposal to separate claim type from evidence strength in the evidence model, per founder feedback.
Action plan derived from Sergey's March 31 founder feedback on access chain model, evidence separation, ownership workflow, and operating layer scope.
Founder response on access-path identity grouping. Reframes the problem from aggregation to access chain as the unit of risk, control, remediation, and prioritization.
Hub for the March 2026 multi-perspective platform review — links all related documents: 7 agent reports, CEO feedback, cross-review, consolidated action plan, and research.
Prioritized implementation plan derived from 5-agent platform review. Maps to Sergey's March 13 sprint email priorities. Includes effort estimates, file locations, and acceptance criteria for each fix.
Implementation plan for hardening the multi-perspective review process with visual UI capture, structured orchestration, and recurring acceptance measurement.
Final consolidated report for CEO review — synthesizes all March 2026 research, reviews, competitor analysis, and market reality into a single actionable document with decision points.
Sergey-facing feedback response to the March 19 final consolidated report for CEO review, written for direct use by engineering.
Founder feedback on the March 23 sprint review and the product direction implied by the current action plan and SV0 Ideas backlog.
Tracks all inline review comments from Sergey on the March 2026 multi-perspective review. Each item linked to source and implementation status.
Sprint review report — visual evidence and verdict for all March 2026 action plan items.
Sprint review report — visual evidence and verdict for all March 2026 action plan items.
Sprint review report — visual evidence and verdict for all March 2026 action plan items.
Stakeholder Review Round 6 — definitive clean run with genuine before/after screenshots (17 pairs, 0 identical). First reliable visual evidence comparison.
Round 8 stakeholder review — 7-role acceptance scoring against sprint-march-2026-final comparing app.securityv0.com (prod) vs dev.securityv0.com (dev)