Skip to main content

March 2026 Platform Review

Current status (2026-03-19): Round 2 MPAS-7 visual review complete — 1 of 7 targets met (Security Auditor). Two broken pages are the top blocker. Phase 0.3 shipped (PR #89). Phases 0.1 and 0.2 partially addressed. See Round 2 review for scores and forward path.


Decisions Needed (Sergey)

#DecisionStatus
1Delta badges on OverviewRESOLVED (Mar 21). Remove — too technical.
2"Authority path" terminologyRESOLVED (Mar 20). Default = Access Path. Formal = Execution Access Path.
3Global risk ranking on OverviewRESOLVED (Mar 20). Both: per-cluster context + global view.
4Evidence pack definitionDEFERRED (Mar 21). Focus on readability first; revisit at Phase 4.

Full decision tracker: Consolidated Action Plan — Pending Decisions

Expanded decisions with recommendations: Final Report — Open Decisions


Start Here

DocumentWhat It Is
Final Report for CEO ReviewStart here — Synthesizes all 7 workstreams (reviews, research, competitor analysis, market feedback) into a single actionable document. 7 decision points for Sergey. Filtered by "NHI with budget today, agentic AI future."
Consolidated Action PlanSingle source of truth for what to build next. Merges sprint plan + Sergey's 28 feedback items + cross-review corrections + applicable research.
Multi-Perspective Platform ReviewThe original combined review from 6 parallel AI agents. Baseline acceptance scores, cross-cutting issues, release readiness.
Sergey's Feedback TrackerAll 28 inline review comments from the CEO, with accept/defer/open status.

Process Hardening

DocumentWhat It Is
Review Process Hardening PlanImplementation plan to add visual UI capture to the review process. 4 phases: visual capture skill (sv0-skills #7), agent updates for screenshot input, acceptance review researcher (sv0-intelligence #5), integration + first validated run.

Validation

DocumentWhat It Is
Sprint Cross-Review ReportRe-validation of the sprint plan by the original reviewer agents. Found 2 gaps, 3 contradictions with Sergey's decisions, 1 stale asset. All resolved in the consolidated action plan.

Individual Agent Reports

Each agent reviewed the live platform at app.securityv0.com (tenant demo-w1) independently.

AgentVerdictReport
CISO Executive70% CISO-readyFull report
Product QAInternal demo readyFull report
SecOps AnalystNEEDS WORK (70%)Full report
UX CriticGrade B-Full report
API/Security AuditorData quality issuesFull report
Enterprise Executive1.8/5 sellabilityv1 (superseded) / v2

Agent definitions live in sv0-platform/.claude/agents/ (ciso-reviewer, secops-analyst, product-qa, ux-critic, security-auditor, enterprise-executive, ceo-reviewer).


Research

DocumentWhat It Is
Research Findings SummaryStart here — CEO-readable summary of all research: 5 findings, what we're taking, what we rejected, and why. Plain language, no academic framing.
Platform Evolution ResearchFull AutoResearchClaw output (all 23 stages). Academic paper: FACET framework, JSD divergence scoring, legibility inversion effect. Review note at top indicates which elements were adopted.
Acceptance Validation Research BriefNew research direction: simulate 18 concrete platform changes, run before/after through 7 reviewer agents, measure acceptance deltas.
Competitor UX AnalysisUX patterns from four RSAC 2026 competitors (Token Security, Geordie AI, Realm Labs, Fig Security) mapped to our 20 usability gaps. 10 stealable ideas with effort estimates.

Round 2 — Visual Acceptance Review (March 19)

First MPAS-7 review with visual screenshot input. 7 agents reviewed 35 screenshots from the 2026-03-19-demo-w1 snapshot.

DocumentWhat It Is
Round 2 Consolidated ReviewFull multi-perspective review with cross-round comparison, Sergey feedback status, research integration, and forward path.
BriefCEO-ready brief with MPAS-7 score table and top 5 priority actions.
Scores (JSON)Machine-readable MPAS-7 scores, deltas, and metadata.

Round 2 Agent Reports

AgentVerdictReport
CISO Executive68% (regression)Full report
SecOps Analyst74% (+4%)Full report
Product QA6P/1M/2DFull report
UX CriticGrade B / 19 termsFull report
Security Auditor0 CRITICAL (target met)Full report
Enterprise Executive2.1/5Full report
CEO ReviewerYES WITH CHANGES (~19/28)Full report

DocumentLocationWhy It's Separate
March Sprint Implementation Plandocs/plans/General sprint plan referenced by other documents. Superseded by the consolidated action plan for this topic, but kept for historical reference.
Self-Hosted Runner Plandocs/plans/2026-03-16-self-hosted-runner-plan.mdInfrastructure plan — unrelated to the review topic.
Design Principlesdocs/product/Derived from this review but applies broadly to all product work.

Timeline

DateEvent
2026-03-13Sergey's sprint planning email requesting spec-vs-implementation alignment
2026-03-156-agent parallel review against live production
2026-03-15Sprint implementation plan drafted from review findings
2026-03-16Sergey's 28 inline feedback comments on the review
2026-03-16Cross-review validation — found 3 contradictions with Sergey's decisions
2026-03-16Impact scores removed (PR #89) — first Sergey feedback item shipped
2026-03-18AutoResearchClaw research started (stages 1-8 completed)
2026-03-19Research critically reviewed, applicable elements extracted
2026-03-19Consolidated action plan created, all contradictions resolved
2026-03-19New acceptance validation research brief created
2026-03-19Visual snapshot captured (35 screenshots, demo-w1 tenant)
2026-03-19Round 2 MPAS-7 review — 7 agents with visual input. 1 of 7 targets met.
2026-03-19Final consolidated report for CEO review — synthesizes all 7 workstreams with 7 decision points